David Poljak vs Gabriele Volpi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Analyzing the second serve performance over the past six months, Volpi holds a slight edge by winning 45.51% of points compared to Poljak's 42.05%. This particular metric is highly correlated with predicting match outcomes, offering insights into each player's proficiency under pressure during a game.

In examining return game performance during the same period, Volpi again demonstrates a small advantage by winning 44.74% of their opponents' second serve points, whereas Poljak wins 43.59%. However, in terms of successfully returning first serves, Poljak comes out on top with 25.24%, while Volpi trails at 23.09%. These statistics play a pivotal role in predicting the favored player in this head-to-head matchup.

Investigating how these players handle pressure, Poljak has proven to be more effective, saving 57.63% of breakpoints in recent games, compared to Volpi's 47.95%. Breakpoint conversion also favors Poljak, who has converted 34.86% of opportunities, whereas Volpi stands at 26.09%, highlighting critical moments in live betting scenarios.

Looking back over the last year, Poljak has secured a 62% match win rate with a record of 31-19, narrowly eclipsed by Volpi's 63.64% win rate with a record of 42-24. When focusing on surface performance, both display their strongest records on Hard courts, with Poljak at 60% (110-74) and Volpi slightly weaker at 58% (33-24). Nevertheless, their records diminish significantly on their weakest surfaces, Clay for Poljak and Indoor Hard for Volpi.

Examining the level of competition faced over the past year, Poljak primarily competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, achieving a 65.96% win rate (31-16), while Volpi, participating at a similar level, obtained a 63.64% win rate (42-24). It is crucial to consider the differing opponent quality, as Poljak faced opponents with an average rank of 77.48, whereas Volpi's opponents had a notably higher average rank of 30.83, reflecting the variability in their competition.

If the match extends to a deciding set, Volpi has a slight advantage, triumphing in 47% of these scenarios against Poljak's 43% win rate. Such details can shape live match predictions and betting strategies. In conclusion, synthesizing all these statistics implies that Volpi has a marginal advantage due to his superior performance under specific conditions and against higher-ranked opponents, positioning him as the slight favorite to clinch the victory. However, elements such as event-specific performances and current form remain integral to forecasting the match’s outcome more accurately.